Monday, April 20, 2009

Ennis Vs Farrah



Who do you think is more suited to State of Origin football ???

I think Ennis is the right man for the job. Farrah is a decent footballer but it seems that Ennis just loves getting in your face and doing the dirty work which is needed to win games. Farrah is more about the flare and tries to spark brilliance out of every play which is good if your team is going well, but it is worthless when you are struggling.

I also would love to see a massive punch up during the origin at some point and I think Ennis is more likely to start a brawl then Farrah. Someone needs to punch Hodges head in and while they swinging I wouldn't mind if 5 or 6 punches hit Cameron "where is my dummy" Smith.

Bring on the Cattle Dog call !!!

5 comments:

  1. Totally agree, I would start Ennis for his "get fucked" attitude but would put Farrah on the bench to add some spark or put more points on if NSW get on top. I think if NSW were to pick Beau Scott in the centres he is a great chance of punching Hodges in the mellon. Both are very niggling players in form at the moment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ennis definately. I hate him, but rate him higher than Farrah, particularly in defence. Farrah's defence against the Panthers a few weeks ago was the worst i have seen from anyone ever, Eion Crossan included! And the begging of selectors to pick him to play lost me. If youre good enough, you dont need to be begging to play

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you blokes. Farrah has lots of flair, but origin games are won by grinding it out, and not making mistakes. Ennis will be a better fit. Farrah's defence in origin would be like Chris Walker's years ago, when Nathan Brown was yelling "Walker's on" everytime he came on!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I still think Adrian Brunker was worse than Eion Crossan...and Adrian played origin for the maroon halfwits....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Loved Brunker, played his best footy for the mighty Red and Whites in the mid-late 90's

    ReplyDelete